Archive for the 'Prager' Category

Bouncy bouncy

September 8, 2008

McCain is up significantly among the only group that matters: likely voters.

In the new poll, taken Friday through Sunday, McCain leads Obama by 54%-44% among those seen as most likely to vote. The survey of 1,022 adults, including 959 registered voters, has a margin of error of +/— 3 points for both samples.

And why?  Enthusiasm.  A full 107% change from before the convention to after the convention:

Before the convention, Republicans by 47%-39% were less enthusiastic than usual about voting. Now, they are more enthusiastic by 60%-24%, a sweeping change that narrows a key Democratic advantage. Democrats report being more enthusiastic by 67%-19%.

I can only speak for myself, but 107% sounds about right- I have done an about-face on my feelings regarding McCain’s prespective presidency.  The reason is twofold:  the impressiveness of McCain himself (the more I see, the more I like), and of Sarah Palin.

I’m not counting my chickens before they hatch, but at this point I agree with Dennis Prager who has been saying all week “the election is McCain’s to lose.”

Another one for the summer reading list: Climate Confusion

May 1, 2008

If you believe in probable catastrophic global climate change, you should think about reading at least one book in opposition to your opinion. And I have a suggestion for that book.

Climate Confusion: How Global Warming Hysteria Leads to Bad Science, Pandering Politicians and Misguided Policies that Hurt the Poor, by former Senior Scientist for Climate Studies at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, Roy Spencer.

Thank you Dennis Prager for having him on your show today.

It pains me to say it

February 17, 2008

But George Will might be right about supporting John McCain. I’m getting used the idea of potentially voting for this man who I really don’t care for.

Video.

However, I haven’t yet decided.  Dr. Dobson, a man who I respect, has made it known that he will not vote for McCain no matter what.

The Happiness Hour

December 23, 2007

Every Friday during the second hour of his radio talk show, Dennis Prager does a service to America and to humanity by having The Happiness Hour.  “Come hell or high water”, Dennis spends each of these hours explaining to people the importance of happiness in life, how it is our own responsibility to make ourselves happy and not let circumstances or others determine our level of happiness, and most importantly he chronicles how the mere human being can overcome this seemingly monstrous burden.

Do yourself a favor, and give these special hours full of wisdom a listen. It will make you a better person.

And this guy gets it:

Mitt’s Itt.

December 11, 2007

I’ve made my decision on who I like for the Republican presidential nomination- and by like, I don’t mean who I’m predicting to win it. I mean the one I want to see clinch it.

It’s not Huckabee; Chuck Norris endorsements not withstanding, he’s just not the guy. Hillary would have him for elevensies. It hurts me to say this, though, as he is the champion of my beloved fairtax.

Thompson is so bad in so many ways, it’s borderline laughable. He might come back, but I don’t see it happening.

I am a big fan of Giuliani, and he has no shortage of apologists whose views I respect (the Dennis’- Prager and Miller- both like him). But God bless him, although he has many admirable qualities, he is simply not a conservative and I can’t support him when there are other, better choices.

As much as it would thrill me to be the ‘go against the flow’ guy, I simply can’t justify Ron Paul. The man is many good things, but a realistic potential POTUS is not one of them. Don’t talk to me about the gold standard, Paulie. And maybe distance yourself from some of the more.. mentally colorful… parts of your base.

John McCain would be my favorite if he were not such an unknown quantity on a few of what ought to be gee, wiz issues. He seems to consistently come down on the wrong side of free speech, immigration, and other things and then try to explain why he’s the one who is making conservative based decisions. Sorry bud, although I would be proud to have you as my president, I’m not buying it for now.

So it’s Mitt. But not by default. He earned it from me via this speech. I haven’t heard anything so genuine and needed in today’s political climate as this in my entire adult life. There are other reasons why Mitt’s my guy, but it’s finals week and this whole post is already one big procrastination. I’ll maybe get around to some of that later.

The speech:

Election Day? Isn’t that the day they have.. the.. elections?

November 6, 2007

I’m up studying for an exam this morning, and around 5:55 I’m going to go vote in the KY gubernatorial election. Little known fact, they call it the gubernatorial race because, generally speaking, all the people racing are gubers.

It’s a going to be a straight up Republican ticket for me. I always feel odd, being as independent minded as I am about things, just pressing the R button and being done with it- like it shouldn’t be that way. But the Dems running this time, as usual, are dangerous. I quote Dennis Prager:

There are two parties, the dangerous party and the stupid party. I choose to be a member of the stupid party.

So there’s really nothing can be done except be on the look out for the very rare decent Democrat, because they do exist. Last time I got to vote for a Dem, for the first time (for some local podunk office). That was interesting. Made me feel all warm and gooey inside- which is what voting for Democrats is all about in the first place, right?

It’s a lost cause though- poor old Ernie Fletcher. He’s a good man, but he’s a goner. I sincerely believe he is the best leader for KY right now, which is a rare thing to have in an election. But it’s not going to happen… he just got caught by the machine.

But you never know… (ugh. Was that optimism? I need to have that looked at.)

The Times they are a changin’?

July 30, 2007

There is an op-ed in the New York Times this morning with the following title: A War We Just Might Win. I highly recommend reading it in its entirety (free login required at nyt.com), but here’s the gist:

Here is the most important thing Americans need to understand: We are finally getting somewhere in Iraq, at least in military terms. As two analysts who have harshly criticized the Bush administration’s miserable handling of Iraq, we were surprised by the gains we saw and the potential to produce not necessarily “victory” but a sustainable stability that both we and the Iraqis could live with.

<snip>

How much longer should American troops keep fighting and dying to build a new Iraq while Iraqi leaders fail to do their part? And how much longer can we wear down our forces in this mission? These haunting questions underscore the reality that the surge cannot go on forever. But there is enough good happening on the battlefields of Iraq today that Congress should plan on sustaining the effort at least into 2008 (emphasis mine- RT).

I have to be honest. I am fiercely opposed to most (all?) of what the Times says, does and stands for because of its undeniably leftist bias; a bias to which it has admitted by the way.  Why then be concerned about what they have to say in this case? Simply put, the Times remains an incredibly influential paper. An op-ed such as this- if it is taken seriously- could have an impact on the opinions of individuals whose voices have been the most scathing in their criticism of how things are going in Iraq.

However, for me personally, there is an even more important reason to respond to this editorial in a guardedly optimistic manner. The war in Iraq has had a severely negative effect on my faith in humanity, in several areas. I don’t have much faith in humanity to begin with- I tend to put my faith in other more deserving persons– however, I would like to think that the majority of people in the world are reasonable people who have at least a passing interest in the welfare of their fellow man. Wouldn’t that be just puppy dogs and ice cream?

First there is the spread of billigerent self-pity which characterizes our enemies, the terrorists; a self-pity which justifies all actions in the mind of the person who is ruled by it. I am not surprised that there are people in the world who act on this debased value system, however I am surprised that it has proven so attractive to so many, whether it is in Iraq, Israel, France, or the United States itself.

Secondly, there are our fellow Americans who, against all reason, have invested themselves in failure.  It is interesting to note that the fortunes of the Democratic party in 2008 will be dependent on whether or not things continue to get worse in Iraq- if we lose, they win. I am not questioning the patriotism of those on the left who question the war, but their wisdom.  There is little certainty in war, but there is one thing of which we can be completely confident. If we pull out of Iraq now, the decent Iraqis who have committed themselves to freedom- the ones who dared to go to the polls and dip their fingers in the purple ink, to believe in the cause of justice against all odds- they will be slaughtered.  An American commitment has been made to decent Iraqis. If we break that commitement, they will die.  This should be obvious to all.  Yet the constant drumbeat from all corners of mainstream media, whether The Times  and CNN, or The Daily Show and Colbert Report, is that it is idiotic to even consider trying to make this work. I retort that it is immoral not to!

But I am daring to be optimistic here.  Perhaps there is sanity in the world after all.  Perhaps even the most belligerently self-commiserate Arabic peoples can eventually understand all that is to be gained from liberalism- and I mean classic liberalism. Perhaps even those committed to defeat cannot resist the urge to hope for victory.  As The Times said so well this morning, there is reason to think both might happen.

Important Note: Thanks to Bill Bennett’s show for the post title- I am not nearly so clever to have thought it up on my own.  Also, I want to reiterate a link above to an interview with Fouad Ajami by Dennis Prager. Click the link and then click “listen now”- you won’t be disappointed. Ajami is the genius who came up with the phrase “belligerent self-pity”- a phrase which so perfectly describes the attitudes of not only modern terrorists, but that of the perpetrators of most of the particularly heinous crimes throughout history, that everyone must start using it immediately.

The Republican Party: AKA, The Stupid Party

July 25, 2007

This will not be a long post. I have a simple truth to share which requires nothing more than a simple quote:

There are two parties in America: the dangerous party and the stupid party. I vote for the stupid party. – Dennis Prager